Essay On Injustice Breeds Evil

Intolerance is the unacceptable situation for people to accept the views, beliefs, or behaviour which differs from their own. We have provided below some essay on intolerance under various words limit in order to help students. Now-a-days, essays and paragraphs writing are common strategy followed by the teachers in schools and colleges. It helps teachers in enhancing student’s skill and knowledge about any topic. All the intolerance essay provided here are written in very easy and simple sentences. So, students can select any of the essays given below according to their need and requirement:

Essay on Intolerance in India

Intolerance Essay 1 (100 words)

Intolerance is the unwillingness of accepting beliefs, behavior or practices of someone different person related to other cast, religion or custom. It may give rise to the high level hate, crimes and discrimination in the society. It gives rise the property of refusal in the mind and heart of any person to refuse, disallow or deny something (action or practice) happening against his/her will or practice. It does not allow people to live with equality, indiscrimination, freedom, or other social rights. Intolerance in the society generally arises due to the cast, culture, gender, religion or any unbearable practice.


Intolerance Essay 2 (150 words)

Intolerance is the act of refusal to accept, appreciate and respect any practices, beliefs, or opinions of the people of another group, religion, cast or custom. Israeli Jews and Palestinians are the best example of high degree of intolerance because of the various issues of identity, self-determination, security, statehood, etc. Intolerance between them is resulted in continue inter-group violence. On the other hand, tolerance is the quality which appreciates equality in the society even after the existence of diversity. It appreciates people for the ability to live as well as let others live whether the person belongs to any religion, cast or custom.

Intolerance disallow a person to go together, follow or bear the practices or opinions by the people of different religion, cast, or nationality from one’s own. According to the William Ury notes, “tolerance is not just agreeing with one another or remaining indifferent in the face of injustice, but rather showing respect for the essential humanity in every person.”

Intolerance Essay 3 (200 words)

Tolerance is considered as the good quality of a man and it is most necessary to make a society. However, intolerance leads a person, people or society to the worst disaster. If we have a look in the history and mythology, we will see variety of horrible acts of intolerance. People develop the feeling of jealous and then intolerance just because of simple things like someone cannot bear the importance of his/her close one’s in the eye of most effective person. One of the historical intolerance acts is Aurangzeb killed many Hindu people under feet of elephants as he developed intolerance to the Hinduism, etc. Some people quarrel to each other as they cannot tolerate each other’s behaviors, beliefs and practices. Intolerant people become unable to take right decision to someone just because of intolerance to hear the views of someone different.

Intolerance is a bad quality which leads a person, society or country towards disaster. On the other hand, people with tolerance can live in the society with equality even after being different in cast, religion, opinion, and practice. Tolerance is a power which makes people able to do justice by hearing and accessing the different views of others. Democratic countries have tolerance as an indispensable quality. Being a tolerant person helps in tolerating any bitter condition in the surrounding areas. Habit of tolerance is the individual culture of every citizen in India. Tolerance is an essential quality of painless life. India is a democratic and developing country where people develop habit of tolerance from their childhood under the guidance of elders so it is rare to see intolerance in India.


Intolerance Essay 4 (250 words)


Intolerance is generally a condition in which people do not accept the practices or behaviors by the people of different religion, cast or culture other than their own’s. In a multiculturalism conference held in the United States, participants asked that, “How can we be tolerant of those who are intolerant of us?” In certain condition, tolerance is not good however it does not mean that for each bad situation one should create the condition of intolerance. Tolerance is an integral quality to the people of different groups related to one another in a respectful and understanding manner. It helps the people of different groups to resolve their differences.

What is Intolerance in India

We cannot say that there is intolerance in India as this country is the best suited example of an idiom called “Unity in Diversity”. It is the fast growing country because of its unique quality of having unity in diversity. It is the country where people of different cast, creed, religion, custom, culture, tradition and practice are living together for years without any difference. They celebrate their fairs and festivals with great enthusiasm and without any interference of people of different group. They have proper understanding and respect to each other’s beliefs, custom and practices. Citizens of India have the quality of tolerance which provides them ability to live and let others live.

A statement of a Bollywood actor, Amir Khan, about the growing climate of intolerance in India was very surprising to everyone as he has made such a serious comment over an unfortunate incident. India is a country where no one can blame that people here are developing intolerance as everyone has proper understanding to each other’s religion and practice.

HowIntolerance affects the Society

Intolerance (especially religious intolerance) separates people living in the society and it acts as divider of the nations. It creates the condition of disrespect, enmity and war in the society between people of different cast, religion, opinions and practices. It puts neighbor against neighbor by creating disbelief to each other.

Intolerance Essay 5 (300 words)


The situation of intolerance may occur because of economically depressed and politically charged situation among the people of different groups. In such situation, people find hard to tolerate those different from themselves. It harms everyone badly and most importantly the nation. The country where intolerance exists may be the home of discrimination, repression, dehumanization, and violence.

What is Intolerance

Intolerance is the separation of unity which creates the condition of dislike, refusal and quarrel among the people of various groups. Whereas, tolerance appreciates unity in diversity (India is a best suited example) and develops understanding to live equally. Tolerance is the ability which develops positive attitude in the people’s mind towards those with different religions, practices, opinions, nationality, customs, etc. Intolerance is the condition of failure which motivates people to dislike the practices, opinions and beliefs of people related to another group. For example, a high degree of intolerance exists between the Israeli Jews and the Palestinians. Intolerance gives rise to the inter-group violence in the society.

Reasons of Intolerance in Indian Society

Intolerance arises in the society because of various reasons. Generally religious intolerance arises in the society which divides the nation. It creates the condition of war by setting neighbors against neighbors. Intolerance may arise between individuals because of the absence of their own experiences. Generally they make their opinions to one another on assumptions which get influenced very easily by the positive or negative beliefs of closest or most influential ones in life.

Individual attitudes towards other person of different group also influenced very easily by his/her images in the media. Bad education system based on the myths can also dehumanize students against other cultures instead of promoting cultural understanding and tolerance among people for diversity and differences in the society. Tolerance is the quality which motivates people to live happily and let others live.


Intolerance Essay 6 (400 words)


Intolerance is the condition of refusal of beliefs, opinions, and practices of people of different groups. Growing tolerance in the society drives different groups apart by creating a sense of denial in any way. The best example of intolerance in the society is separation between black and white South Africans in the South Africa. There is a huge level of social distance between these two groups which gives rise to the inter-group resentment and hostility.

About Intolerance

Intolerance is a dangerous and unacceptable quality which should be suppressed to grow in the society. It destroys the growing power of any country by setting people against people of different groups. People living in the intolerant society groups can do aggressive attack in order to express their denial to the opinions, practices, and behavior of other people related to different group. Intolerance can be religious, racial or other types however all badly affect the nation growth and development. It is an international problem because of the religious, cultural, traditional, customs, or way of thinking differences of people. It is the main cause of war among people or nations. Good education system, developing tolerance and agreement are better ways using which the problem of intolerance can be solved to a great extent.

Intolerant people never accept someone different which has been the main issue since ancient history all around the world. Intolerance makes people angry and violent to each other (people of various cast and religion) very easily to something they cannot tolerate in anyway. Good education system and tolerance make them able to know how to get control over their intolerance. The practice of tolerance can be practiced from the school age of kids. They should be taught to accept differences in the society.

Effects of Intolerance

Intolerance worries people, society and nation as it creates violence among people of different groups. It causes exclusion of those who are different and intolerable such as existence of non-Muslims in the Muslim state or its opposite. Intolerance makes human beings narrow mindedness and does not give chance to thing positive about anything happening in different way in the society or nation. It has high level destroying capacity and very dangerous for the nation where it exist. So, it is better to stop it from growing in any society or country instead of reducing its percentage.

How to Deal with Intolerance

Intolerance should be discouraged and tolerance should be encouraged among people. Tolerance can be promoted by using various methods. Intimate inter-group contact enhances personal experiences to each other and reduces intolerance. Intimate inter-group contact should be continued to make it effective and useful. Dialogue mechanisms can also be effective for enhancing communication on both sides. It helps people to express their needs and interests. Media should select positive images to promote tolerance and understanding towards cultural sensitivity. Education is the best way to promote tolerance and peaceful coexistence in the society. Students should be provided tolerant environment in the school so that they can respect and understand different cultures. Students can better develop the inter-cultural understanding in the tolerant environment.


Related Information:

International Day for Tolerance and Peace

For all their familiar ring, what do such statements mean? Are they true? What are they based on? Common sense, divine revelation, historical experience, empirical testing?

Here is where the slight variations cease to be slight. There is a world of difference between ''violence begets violence'' and ''violence begets only violence.'' In practice, the difference blurs as one phrase is often used as shorthand for the other.

Put simply, ''violence begets violence'' expresses a common-sense reality that, upon reflection, almost no one from the school psychologist to the four-star general would deny. Whether in the case of the schoolyard bully finally getting his comeuppance or of a naked aggression being stopped on the battlefield, even the most welcome victories are never achieved without planting at least some germs of future conflict.

Bitterness gnaws at the losers; arrogance tempts the victors; the taste of battle lingers on the two sides. Will these toxins in the bloodstream prove deadly or amenable to treatment? ''Violence begets violence'' does not say. It only warns that there will always be some price to pay and a challenge to be met. It will take more than war to end all wars.

''Violence begets more violence,'' on the other hand, is ambiguous. If ''more'' simply means ''further'' or ''future,'' the added word changes little. But if ''more'' means -- or implies -- ''greater'' violence, then the statement takes on a new cast.

If World War I were said to have led to World War II, then perhaps violence begot not only future violence but greater violence. If World War II were said to have led to the cold war, was the violence greater? By what measure? And the American Civil War? No doubt it introduced new military technologies to the world and insinuated new strains of violence into the American character, but did it beget greater violence?

Obviously, to claim that violence, as a rule, breeds greater violence requires chains of causation and comparative measures of outcomes that must remain highly subjective and speculative. After all, did World War I itself beget World War II, or was it the Treaty of Versailles or the Great Depression or German political culture or a great many other things, all in hard-to-determine proportions?

The problem is still more severe with the strongest claim yet: ''Violence begets only violence.'' Doesn't violence beget many things? Doesn't violence also beget justice, sometimes at least, along with injustice, the proportion between them varying from case to case rather than inevitably established?

The Civil War begot the end of slavery, although not racial equality. World War II begot an end to genocidal Nazism. And the war also begot, along with a democratic Western Europe, the extension of Soviet totalitarianism in Eastern Europe.

However one weighs such goods and evils, history gives little ground for that categorical ''only.''

Indeed, anyone trying to trace a path through the murky terrain of recent history will stumble over another embarrassing possibility. Does nonviolence sometimes beget violence?

To raise that possibility, without making it a general law, does not deny the teachings or achievements of Gandhi and Dr. King. It simply points to another widely held conclusion, that the unwillingness of democratic nations like France, Britain and the United States to resist Hitler's serial aggressions in the 1930's with military force had devastating consequences.

Nan Keohane, the president of Duke University, made a parallel case about the Sept. 11 attacks. She said: ''We are currently in a situation where violence indeed begets violence, but in a different way: If the violence goes unchecked, it begets yet more violence from those who originally launched it.''

In sum, these three variations lie along a spectrum. They start from a sad but important observation about the human condition and slide to an ambiguous, debatable claim about historical events and then to an almost certainly false thesis about a single, inevitable consequence.

As cautionary rhetoric, they may be useful. As formulas for resolving specific political and moral quandaries, they do not suffice. Bumper-sticker phrases, even eloquent ones proclaimed by sainted individuals, seldom do.

Continue reading the main story

0 Thoughts to “Essay On Injustice Breeds Evil

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *