Social Conformity Essay
528 Words3 Pages
Human beings are defined as ''social animals'' because in every aspects of life they live together, they form a variety of groups and improve relationships with each other. Interaction with others is a natural result of living in society. In the process of interaction, society and its rules has a social impact on each individual. If people face with any kind of social impact such as group pressure, great part of them show conformity by changing their behaviors, ideas, decisions in expected way. A person conforms if he or she chooses a course of action that a majority favors or that is socially acceptable. Some kind of conformity is natural and socially healthy but obeying all the norms, ideas, and decisions without thinking or accepting…show more content…
We must decide for ourselves whether to conform to such a social etiquette. We are taught as soon as we are old enough to grasp the idea that it is bad to be unique and to avoid being different. At some point, however, we must decide within ourselves whether to spend every day trying to be like everyone else because society says we should or living each day true to ourselves. Our strength as a person is proven through what we decide. The benefits of being true to ourselves greatly outweigh any negative aspects of choosing that path.
One of the most obvious advantages of being true to ourselves is that people will see us, perhaps for the first time, without a mask. People will see what we are really like on the inside. They will see our talents, imperfections, and preferences. Then they will have the opportunity to accept us on our own terms. As we work to show our true selves to society, we may discover things about ourselves we did not already know. If we want to be great, we can safely assume that we must be willing to be misunderstood. However, we cannot be misunderstood if we conform to the standards of society. If we act and think and talk exactly as everyone else, we will never run the risk of being taken the wrong way.
Second, society teaches us to conform by not thinking for ourselves. We are simply told how to solve a problem or accomplish a task. We are never taught why
Social Influence Conformity Essay examples
763 Words4 Pages
Sherif (1936) studied responses of the auto-kinetic effect on both groups and individuals. By placing participants in a darkened room with a minute source of light at the far end he discovered that participants were eluded and saw the light moving - this was because there was no other point of reference for them to focus on. Participants were asked how far the light was moving, when alone they would state many different answers but when groups were tested the answers of the last participants were taken as a reference for the next answer this created a group norm, this group influence was to be so powerful that when participants of the group test were to proceed as individuals those answers had become internalised and a lack of…show more content…
the students found the correct answer 99% of the time. Asch sent for one student at a time and met with them individually at first and then with a number of confederates, the 8" test was repeated three times with each participant. This time the answer was to be given out loud to the rest of the room, the first and second time all students were in agreement but on the third the confederates were instructed to give the wrong answer. In a reported 33% of these cases the subject student fell into conformity and agreed with the group. (Sixth Edition, understanding Human Behaviour, James V. McConnell, 1988,) The main arguments against this study are that it is reductionist by only involving students, this cannot be generalised, but allowences must be made for variations within rest of the population, i.e. sex, age and cultural background, therefor it would be incorrect of Asch to generalise and say that this study proves that a third of all people will conform in this type of situation. Although many variables were tested it is inconceivable to think that a final formula or figure can be put on levels of conformity. A point of common criticism for both Sherif and Asch's work is the point of demand characteristics which motivates participants to conform to the pre-conceived idea of what the experimenter would expect of them.( <a